.jpg)
Open ten executive LinkedIn posts this morning. Same hooks. Same line breaks. Same tidy little lessons. It is not your imagination. The tools made it that way.
Most LinkedIn tools now write with AI. Taplio, Supergrow, Jasper, EasyGen, Kleo. That sounds like a gift. More posts, less work. But there is a cost nobody prints on the sales page. When everyone uses the same kind of AI, everyone starts to sound the same.
I am Charles K. Davis, a Fractional CDO. I watched this exact thing happen 30 years ago, long before AI. Let me tell you about the day data stopped being magic.
Early in my career I worked with one of the first powerful data analysis systems. Back then, slicing a mountain of numbers in minutes felt like magic. Almost no one could do it. If you had that tool, you had an edge. You saw things your competitors could not.
Then the tool spread. The software got cheaper. Soon every team had it. And a strange thing happened. The reports all started to look alike. The same charts. The same summaries. The tool that once set you apart now made you blend in.
The edge did not vanish. It moved. It moved from having the tool to asking a question the tool's owner never thought to ask.
That is the rule, and it never breaks. A tool gives you an edge only while it is rare. The moment it spreads, it flips. It stops making you stand out and starts making you sound like everyone else.
AI writing is now the common tool. So it is flipping the same way.
Here is the simple reason the posts sound alike. These tools mostly pull from the same kind of model. They chase the same trending topics. They lean on the same hook templates. And the AI is built to give you the most likely sentence.
Think about what that means. The most likely sentence is the average sentence. It is the thing most people would already say. Average is safe. Average is fast. Average is also forgettable.
So ten thousand executives type a similar prompt, get a similar draft, and post a similar thought. The feed turns to soup.
You break it by giving the AI something it cannot make up.
One test settles it. Before you post, ask: could a stranger with the same tool have produced this? If yes, delete it. If no, you have something only you can say.
Most tools start with the AI and hope you add something human later. The Maverick Advantage Platform (M.A.P.) flips the order. It starts with the signal in your market, then your experience, and only then helps you write. Same building blocks. Different order. A completely different result.
That is why posts that begin with M.A.P. do not sound like the feed. They start from something the feed does not have.
Because most tools use the same kind of model, chase the same trends, and aim for the most likely sentence. The most likely sentence is the average one, so the outputs cluster together and blur.
No, as long as you lead with your own ideas and experience. AI is good at tidying your words. It is weak at having something to say. Use it to draft, not to think.
They are closer to each other than the ads suggest. The human part does not come from the tool. It comes from what you feed it: your story, your numbers, your point of view.
Start from a real moment only you lived. Give the AI your raw take first. Then let it clean up the grammar. The order matters more than the tool.
The data tool stopped being an edge the day everyone had it. AI writing just crossed that same line. The winners will not be the ones who post the most. They will be the ones who say what no one else can.
If you want help finding that voice in your market, book a short strategy call. We will start from one real shift in your space.
Keep reading: why no software can make you a LinkedIn authority, the difference between scheduling and authority, and what M.A.P. actually does.
Stop Reading. Start Seeing.
